网站首页 公文大全 个人文档 实用范文 讲话致辞 实用工具 心得体会 哲学范文 总结范文 范文大全 报告 合同 文书 信函 实用
  • 汇报体会
  • 节日庆典
  • 礼仪
  • 毕业论文
  • 评语寄语
  • 导游词
  • 口号大全
  • 其他范文
  • 百花范文网 > 实用范文 > 汇报体会 > [跨文化交际时间观记时制度]

    [跨文化交际时间观记时制度]

    时间:2021-05-10 11:01:18来源:百花范文网本文已影响

    Contents Chinese Abstract 2 English Abstract 3 1. Introduction 4 1.1 Overview of This Thesis 4 1.2 Meaning of the Research 4 2. Literature Review 5 2.1 Domestic Studies 5 2.2 Foreign Studies 6 3. The Chinese and American Time Systems 7 3.1 Chinese Polychronic Time System 8 3.2 American Monochronic Time System 8 4. The Differences of Time Systems and Causes 9 4.1 The Differences of Time Systems 10 4.2 The Causes of Different Time Systems 11 5. Conclusion 13 References 14 跨文化视角下中美时间观中记时制度的差异分析 摘 要 近年来,中国加快了对外开放的步伐,加强了与世界的联系。来自不同背景的人们在日常生活、学习和商业事务中的交流也变得不可避免。本文以爱德华·霍尔的单向记时制和多向记时制的理论为研究基础,从文化、历史、宗教等多个角度分析比较中美双方记时制度的差异和产生因素。

    时间观是人类在社会生活和劳动实践中逐渐形成的,中美作为东西方文化的典型代表,在记时制度上有着鲜明的特点,极具可比性。人们的思维和行动深受其不同的文化影响,而生活方式的不同,导致了对时间安排和分配的灵活性差异,从而形成单、多向的时间观和记时制度。

    在跨文化交际活动中,时间观作为非语言交际不可或缺的重要部分,对记时制度差异的研究有助于加深我们对文化差异的理解,从而更有效的进行国际交往。

    关键词:跨文化交际;
    时间观;
    记时制度 n An Analysis on the Differences of Time Systems between China and the United States from the Perspectives of Intercultural Communication Abstract In recent years, China has accelerated the pace of the opening-up and strengthened ties with the world. Communication between people from different backgrounds is also inevitable in daily life, study and business affairs. Based on Hall Edward’s monochronic and polychronic time theory, this paper analyzes and compares the differences and causes of the time systems between China and the United States from the perspectives of culture, history and religion. The time perspectives are gradually formed in the practice of social life and labor. As a typical representative of Eastern and Western cultures, China and America have distinct characteristics in the time systems, which are very comparable. People’s thinking and actions are influenced by their very different cultures, and different lifestyles, which will lead to the flexibility disparity of time arrangement and distribution, thus forming mono-chronic and poly-chronic time perspectives and timing systems. In cross-cultural communication activities, time concept is an indispensable part of non-verbal communication. The study on the differences of time systems is helpful to deepen our understanding of cultural differences, so as to carry out international communication more effectively. Key words: intercultural communication; time perspectives; time systems 1. Introduction As typical representatives of two difference types of cultures, China and America have distinct and comparable characteristics in terms of time systems. Further understanding the different views of time between China and America, can aid us to make effective intercultural communication so as to achieve our goals. 1.1 Overview of This Thesis After China’s joined the WTO, opening-up system has become more and more mature, and cross-border, cross-ethnic, cross-cultural exchanges are also increased more frequently. People from diverse backgrounds mutual learning from various aspects. Time is a non-verbal culture that can convey a lot of information in cross-cultural communication. The time orientation derived from anthropology, sociology and other disciplines refers to the time regional trend in which people emphasize or choose their views, behaviors, attitudes and so on (许谦, 2012(11): 126). As an important aspect of the non-verbal cross-cultural communication, the study of time perspectives can help us to understand the cultural differences and carry out effective international exchange. In all ages, time plays a significant role in human activities, but the people’s attitudes vary towards time in different cultures. With the increasing exchanges between China and America, there are more chances to communicate with Americans. So we need to understand the different time concept between China and the United States to make sure that the cross-cultural communication between China and the USA not fail due to the differences in the time concept. This thesis adopts the method of comparison and analysis to study the differences on the basis of time perspectives between China and America, and uses Edward’s theory to build up the theoretical frameworks: monochronic and polychronic time systems theories. The author analyzes and compares the differences of the time systems of two counties, aiming to improve people’s communication skills and eliminate the misunderstanding and conflict in the cross-cultural activities. 1.2 Meaning of the Research The concept of time belongs to the deep structure of culture. China and the United States have different traditions and culture backgrounds, therefore people from different cultural and traditional backgrounds have different concepts of time. With the increasing frequency of cross-cultural communication in today’s world, the comparison of time systems between China and America is a meaningful study. Levine Robert once said in his book Geography of Time: “Time is the way nature uses to prevent things from happening at the same time” (Robert, 1998: 68). This shows that things themselves have the order of time. Hall Edward, an American cultural anthropologist and founder of cross-cultural communication, once pointed out: “Time can speak, it is more frank than vocal language, its message is loud and clear, because it is neither controlled by consciousness nor misleading as vocal language, it tends to expose lies expressed in words” (Edward, 1959: 55). It can be seen that time can be used as a way of non-verbal communication, playing a very hidden but important role in determining the success or failure of communication. People from different cultural backgrounds have different views on time, which bring obstacles to cross-cultural business communication. It is no doubt helpful for people engaged in cross-cultural business activities to understand each other’s time language, eliminate communication and understanding barriers, and carry out communication and business activities smoothly. 2. Literature Review Up to now, with numerous researches on time perspectives, there are many well-known theories and remarkable achievements at home and abroad. Based on those theories, the author sums up some studies results and puts forward a new viewpoint of China and American time systems from the perspectives of intercultural communication. 2.1 Domestic Studies In traditional Chinese, the word “time” was not very popular, and it is widely known after Hu Shi’s use of “time” and “space”. A general treatise on the historical form of time and its changes are relatively rare. The Social and Cultural History of Time, written by Zhan Xiaobai (2013), it is to investigate the changes of time systems and time concept in modern China. It has not only become a creative academic work in this field, but also the first historical monograph to explore the time problem of modern China. This book studies China’s modern view of time, the core of which is punctuality and efficiency. In other words, the value of time is no longer focused on the self-growth of individual life; it’s more about economic development and social evolution. The author not only pays attention to reveal the evolution of the concept of “time value” of ordinary people in the society, it also involves the historical view of time with evolution as the main content. There is no doubt that these discussions in that book have laid an important academic foundation for the historical study of time in modern China. At the same year Zhan Xiaobai (2013) published another book named The Social and Cultural History of Time -- Study on Time System and Concept Change in Modern China. For the first time, this book, with the theme of “time”, gives a complete picture of the change of modern time system and time concept from the perspective of social and cultural history. The contents of the book can be divided into three parts: firstly, it explores the historical sources of the change of time system in modern China, and its overall changing trend. Secondly, it focuses on depicting the pluralistic aspects of modern time socialization and to reveal its material basis and dynamic mechanism. Thirdly, it makes an in-depth investigation on the modern transformation of the concept of time, which includes the modern people’s rational cognition of daily life time, historical time, and philosophy time and so on. 2.2 Foreign Studies 2.2.1 Edward’s Monochronic and Polychronic Time Theory In the 1970s, Hall Edward (1976) put forward the concepts of monochronic and polychronic time in the book Beyond Culture for the first time according to the habits of each nation in the use of time. Edward divides the use of time in diverse cultures into two systems: monochronic time and polychronic time. The former put more emphasis on the schedule; strictly abide the timetable to do everything. They must finish all tasks on time, and cannot affect the arrangement of the next one. Monochronic people pay attention to punctuality and strictly abide by dating time. If you let a person with monochronic time concept background wait, they will think that is wasting their limited time, and even think that it is rude and disrespectful to them. The latter pays attention to the flexibility of time use and tends to make long-term planning and they habit of allowing multiple things to be done at a time. Polychronic does not have the habit of scheduling, nor pays attention to observing the schedule. Many different tasks can be done at the same time. Therefore the monochronic people seem to be inefficient and unplanned. Edward once pointed out: “Time becomes a room which some people are allowed to enter, while others are excluded” (Edward, 1976: 90). Mono-chronic time people influenced by this concept, emphasizing one for one, are used to concentrate on one thing at a time. American mostly belong to monochronic time system, where they believe that time can never be replaced by other things, advocates to do only one thing in a specific time period, and stress more importance to time and schedule. Corresponding to this is the Chinese view of polychronic time system, in which people allow multitasking at a time. Chinese tends to adopt polychronic time value. Ethnic groups in this culture advocate doing a lot of things in a period of time. They are not simply controlled and limited by time or schedule and it has highly flexibility. Edward believes that the defect of polychronic timing system is that people attach too much importance to the solution of the problem and the relationship with people, do not care about the timetable. People with monochronic timing system are usually caring about the timetable, but seldom solve much practical problems. Edward says that: “The time model of western countries such as Europe and America is monochronic timing system and polychronic timing system countries is Asia, Africa and Latin America” (Edward, 1959: 64). 2.2.2 Edward’s High Context and Low Context Theory Context is the environment in which language is used, including all subjective and objective factors. In the book Beyond Culture, Hall Edward (1976) proposed that culture is contextual, and divided it into High Context and Low Context. “Anything can be characterized as high, medium or low context,” says Edward (Edward, 1976: 34). In a high context culture, the meaning of the speaker’s speech or behavior comes from or is internalized in the context in which the speaker is speaking; he often expresses more than he says. Low-context things are just the opposite. Most of the information must be in the transmitted information in order to make up for the missing parts of the context (internal context and external context). In a low-context culture, people emphasize the content of the communication, rather than the context of the time. He also divided the world into high context cultures and low-context culture. The so-called low context means that everything needs to be clearly explained in language, that is, both parties do not share a common context. High context means that many meanings are included in the context, and it is not necessary to express every point clearly. In a low-context culture, communicative information is mainly conveyed by words, in a high-context culture, communicators mainly rely on context to convey information. Edward’s insights in context in the dimension of cultural values, broadens the horizon and channels of context research with very important guiding significance. 2.2.3 Other Related Studies American contemporary new culture historian Lynn Hunt (2008), in his book Measuring Time, Making History, emphasizes on the discussion of the nature of time. He was concerned about how Western Christian civilization developed a unique way of dating, and how does it affect Western historical concepts. It also gives a brief perspective on how the concepts of “modernity” entered and influenced the history of the West. Jacques Goff (1982), the outstanding representative of the third generation of the French Annals School, is also renowned for her excellent study of the “medieval time” in Europe, and left a model work. His book Time, Work and Culture in the middle Ages has long been a classic in this field. 3. The Chinese and American Time Systems As representatives of different cultures, China and the United States are totally different in terms of time systems. The study of different time systems will help us to be in a favorable position in cross-cultural communication. We can also avoid making some mistakes caused by time systems differences. 3.1 Chinese Polychronic Time System The concept of polychronic time holds that time is scattered, arbitrary. The ways for time calculate is not so accurate, multiple tasks can be done together, and tend to make long-term and effective planning. China is a typical country with polychronic time-orientation. People who are polychronic are used to dealing with a few things at a time, with more random time. They don’t have the habit of scheduling the schedule, do not care about the timetable, and do not pay attention to meeting the date of the appointment. It’s common for Chinese people to be late. For individuals, their experience of time is that it has beginning and end; however, for human being as a whole, the time is a cycle as well as an eternal operation (胡文仲, 1998). The Poly-chronic person appears to have a low efficiency and no plan. The polychronic time system has the advantages of being flexible, but it also has neglect of time arrangement, which is easy to influence the work. To some extent, China belongs to poly-chronic cultural model. The Chinese have a more tolerant attitude towards sudden visits, lateness, broken appointments, mistiming and so on. Relatives and friends can visit at anytime and anywhere without making an appointment in advance. The multidimensional time-oriented culture holds that time is infinite; therefore it’s easy to change schedule and deadline, which is very common in Chinese people’s everyday life. Because of the weak time sense, the nation does not pay much attention to punctuality in interpersonal communication, and acts more casually and humanely. Chinese always directly pay a visit to each other’s home without appointment in advance. If the host is idle, they will be accommodated immediately, on the contrary, they have to wait. In the eyes of the Westerner, this is a very wasteful act of time. With the rapid development step of China’s modernization, we are absorbing the foreign culture all the time. The different concept of time is also gradually changing. With the acceleration of the pace of life, the concept of time in China has changed intentionally or unintentionally from polychronic time system to monochronic time system. Meanwhile, Westerners’ understanding and acceptance of the traditional concept of time in Chinese culture are also increasing. With the increasing exchange between various cultures the phenomenon of cultural integration is gradually become up-and-up, and the original traditional concept of time between China and the West is also changing and integrating. 3.2 American Monochronic Time System The concept of monochronic time holds that time is divisible, straight-line, like a belt or road extending backward into the past and forward into the future. Monochronic time people attach importance to schedule, the stage and accuracy of time, emphasize special time and speed, can only do one thing in a certain time, and tend to make short-term planning (时静, 2014(07): 67). People with monochronic time orientation are mainly from North America, Northern Europe and other countries (Edward, 1959). American time system belongs to monochronic time, in which they emphasizes planning and focus on high efficiency. At work, a monochronic person pays attention to preparation in advance. In order to improve efficiency and make time use more efficient, Americans will draw up plans and prepare them well. American monochronic time system stresses scheduling, do only one task at a time, strictly following the timetable. At the end of the day, whether things completed or not it must stop, and it can’t affect the next arrangement. In highly industrialized western countries, people think that time is limited, which can be quantified as goods; time is endowed with supreme value and very precious. The concept that time is money is deeply rooted in the hearts of the people (陈春卿, 2008(04): 41). During most of their lives, time and money are the most scarce and precious elements of their lives, and the only thing that people always feel most influential and valuable comparable to the other things. Time determines everything in people’s daily life and practice, and it is difficult for anyone to escape the iron hand control of time. Americans even call themselves “slave to nothing but clock” (Edward, 1976: 53). Americans prefer to build short-term relationships because long-term relationships have more uncontrollable factors, and short-term relationships can avoid unnecessary interruptions and do things more efficiently. Monochronic time objectively manipulates social life and closely weaves people’s life network. Therefore, westerners have learned to take time and cherish time seriously from an early age, and paid much attention to appointment and punctuality as the code of conduct of the whole society. The last-minute notice was distasteful because it would disrupt the original plan and surprise people. The advantage of monochronic timing system is that it is very efficient: it allows people to make a plan beforehand, and strictly follow this schedule. They must fulfill only one task at a time without any postpone. But it also has the weakness -- the lack of flexibility. So, the Americans are influenced by this single-time cultural model. 4. The Differences of Time Systems and Causes Edward said: “In the Western world, no one can escape the iron bowl control of time. In fact, social and commercial life and even sexual life are manipulated by time. Time, completely weaves the network of people’s lives” (Edward, 1982: 43). Differences of time systems are reflected in many aspects, such as lifestyle, time management and business affairs. At the same time, the causes of different time systems are also varied. 4.1 The Differences of Time Systems 4.1.1 Life Style The time perspective directly affects people’s concept and life style. Americans follow the idea of time and money. For most Americans, time and money are the most scarce and precious factor in the basic problem of human survival for most of the time. They cherish and value time, and time even efficiency as a measure of one’s ability. This time concept results in a fast-paced life. The greatest benefit for people with this kind of lifestyle is the higher work efficiency. In order to make their limited time more effective to use, they focus on time-based arrangements to pay attention to date and duration of work. People are trying to do as much as things in a limited time. On the other hand, Chinese people have a more flexible view of time and leisure lifestyle. There are many such proverbs in Chinese language: “Eat hot Tofu slowly”. It means not to worry about anything, and tomorrow is not done today (崔可, 2009(35): 607). Chinese society is more tolerant of being late. Even when it comes to meeting time, people are often late, and people usually wait for everyone to arrive before they start their activities. It is a small matter for the Chinese to be five-minute late. What’s more, it is regarded that important people or people with high status should come a little late, and coming on time will degrade their status. In China, time limits are often seen as a reminder that they are close to the deadline, and everyone knows that there is still some time after the deadline as another deadline. One Chinese teacher who was about to leave the United States invited his American friends to dinner the day before, but was refused by his friends: “Oh, I’m sorry, I have plans tomorrow.” Naturally, the Chinese teacher felt very uncomfortable and think that the Americans were too inflexible. In fact, this is due to the American concept of time, the pre-agreed time cannot be changed at will, prior appointment must be scheduled on time, after the appointment can only be arranged separately. The above example shows that different cultures have specific values and time orientations. In cross-cultural communication activities, both parties should consider paying attention to each other’s lifestyle and using specific communication methods. 4.1.2 Business Affairs As we all know, there are great differences between China and the United States in their ways of doing business. Being punctual is a significant point in the American time concept. It is necessary for a person to start and end on time, whether it is a meeting or a date. Americans tend to have a strong sense of time and well-planned. Punctuality is an important symbol of respect for others and also for Americans, who regard cherishing time as a noble and necessary virtue. And meeting the date and delivering tasks before the deadline is considered to be a person with good credit. Americans with a strong sense of time maintain the habit of future arrangement. They regard managing time as a skill that can be learned in management classes, and scientific time management can play an important role in achieving goals effectively. Especially in the modern era called technological era, the concept of time, which represents the characteristics of the times, is a combination of refined measure time and linear time (吴国盛, 1999). Chinese culture is vague about the concept of time and timing systems, and the time calculation system is also not so accurate as today. Therefore, during daily interpersonal communication people ignore to stress appointment and punctuality. Also in business affairs Chinese people usually can handle multiple transactions simultaneously. For example, when a company manager convenes a department meeting, he can have other appointments during that time; or his subordinates can enter to ask him to sign files, even ask him to answer the phone. 4.2 The Causes of Different Time Systems 4.2.1 Cultural Factors China was an agricultural country from ancient times. Farming culture is the root of Chinese ancient inhabitants. For agricultural reasons, land becomes the lifeblood of farmers, who had lived in a self-sufficient agricultural society for thousands of years, creating many similar villages and towns with little commercial activities. Even now, after decades of economic development, agriculture still accounts for a large proportion and highly position in national economy. In addition, farmers make up the majority of China’s population. Farming culture brings Chinese people a leisurely attitude and way of life, which makes people’s time consciousness weaker and weaker. The relatively weak sense of time makes people not have a deep understanding of appointment, punctuality, daily intercourse and visit. People just care about whether affairs are finished or not, rather than the length of completion time. Farmers have been on the same land for every generation. Therefore, Chinese, influenced by agricultural culture, regard time as multidimensional. On the contrary, people live in an industrialized culture background always pay constant attention to watches and clocks. Everyone has to do things according to the schedule and finish them within the deadline. In addition, the production line is the symbol of industrial society. Once it has passed, it will not come back. If Americans lose their clocks, they will be a mess. In short, Americans have an acute sense of time for they have been influenced by industrial culture for a long time, which makes it possible for people to grasp the exact time. 4.2.2 Historical Factors After thousands of years history, influenced by long-term historical factors. Chinese polychronic timing system has a more common time inequality. The Chinese are good at building all kinds of relationships and are more concerned about it rather than work, such as superior leaders, mentors and teachers, those who with highly economic status and authority. Therefore, through a long period of agricultural life, Chinese are subject to the influence of the cycle of the day, and the time concept of the polychronic time system is formed. Zeng Jianping believes that: “The ethnic groups with excessive traditional burden pay attention to history and the past, which is generally the time orientation of the past. And the ethnic groups with a short history tend to be the orientation of the present or the future” (曾剑平, 廖晓明, 2007(03): 56). China is under the polychronic timing system, which stresses temporary use of time. Most of people do not have detailed plans of daily things, the view of time is also relatively loose, and the pace of life is slow and leisurely. From a historical point of view, the origin of the American concept of monochronic time can trace back to the colonial period before the founding of the United States. In order to improve the efficiency and extract more benefits from the workers, the owners in the south realized that they should not only increase the working time, but also emphasize the output and efficiency of the workers in the unit time. This idea was later reinforced by Benjamin Franklin’s famous saying, “time is money”. Since 1840, home alarm clocks had become a must. Most Americans like to live and work according to their own schedule and do not welcome uninvited guests. If you want to visit others, making an appointment is the best way, and visit on time according to your appointment. Moreover, Americans are concerned about deadlines. The task or work must be completed within a fixed time range. 4.2.3 Religious Origins The long-term accumulated impact of culture background has formed different concepts of time. The formation of the concept of time in polychronic time system in China is inseparable from Taoist thought. Taoism is one of traditional and well-known religions in China. Taoism advocates, human reincarnation and returns to nature. Taoist thought holds that every life has life and death, but the definition of death is not absolute, it is only a link in the process of life cycle in the universe. Louis Gadi believe that: “Respect, praise and worship for the ancestors, and even the long dead, have a structural impact on the psychology of the Chinese people” (路易·加迪, 1988: 97). Taoist thought that all life has life and death, it is only a link in the process of life cycle in the universe (李涛, 2016(04): 382). There are many reasons for the formation of the time systems, the most important of which is the influence of Confucianism for thousands of years. Confucian culture has always advocated taking history as a mirror to guide the present and the future by studying the past. This is why Chinese people are used to following traditional ideas and methods of doing things, people worship ancestors, respect the elderly, attach importance to experience (王秀琴, 2011(15): 142). The concept of monochronic time system in the United States is closely related to its Christian and biblical culture, which advocates the evil human nature with its original sin. In Christian culture, Adam and Eve, the ancestor of human being, stole the forbidden fruit, committed the original sin, and were expelled from paradise forever and demoted to the world to suffer. Paradise cannot go back, only by hard work, can Christian achieve the last trial. This is the religious origin of the American time system. Under the long-term impact of this concept, Americans seldom abide by the rules, look forward and always focus on the future time, focusing their energy and efforts on achieving their immediate goals. They believe that only by trying to move forward and constantly transcend. To sum up, the Chinese and American view of time is influenced by many factors, which can also change the formation and development of the time systems. Therefore, the Chinese belong to polychronic time system, used to take history as a warning and like review the past. And the United States has developed into monochronic timing system, cherishing time and focusing on work efficiency. Both time systems have its merits and meaning, and we must respect the differences. 5. Conclusion China and the United States are on behalf of two different cultures, and the exchanges between these two countries belong to the category of cross-cultural communication. This paper compares and analyzes the differences and causes of time systems between two countries in order to improve people’s communication skills. Through the study of the differences time systems, the author recognized that, in the process of cross-cultural communication, participants not only need to understand each other’s cultural characteristics, also respect for time system differences. When conducting cultural exchanges with other countries, it is necessary to know the local cultural system in advance and do as the Romans do, so as to avoid cultural conflicts. The very important principle that we should always keep in mind is that: we should eliminate of cultural superiority, cultural centralism, bias and determination, and take a tolerant attitude to the time perspective of others. Then we can better understand the differences in time systems. Only in this way can both sides have equal and sincere communication so as to continuously discover and solve problems. References [1] Goff, Jacques. Time, Work, and Culture in the middle Age [M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982. [2] Hall, Edward. The Silent Language [M]. New York: Anchor Books, 1959. [3] Hall, Edward. Beyond Culture [M]. New York: Anchor Doubleday, 1976. [4] Hall, Edward. Mono-chronic and Poly-chronic Time [A]. Samovar Larry, Richard E, Porter A. Reader [C]. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing House, 1982. [5] Hunt, Lynn. Measuring Time Making History [M]. New York: Central European University Press, 2008. [6] Levine, Robert. Geography of Time [M]. New York: Basic Books, 1998. [7] 陈春卿. 让时间说话——从时间维度解读中美文化差异[J]. 牡丹江大学学报, 2008(04): 40 - 42. [8] 崔可. 中美时间观差异分析[J]. 科技信息, 2009(35): 607 - 609. [9] 胡文仲. 跨文化交际学选读[M]. 湖南:湖南教育出版社, 1998. [10] 李涛. 中西方时间取向差异对比研究[J]. 沈阳工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2016(04): 381 - 384. [11] 路易·加迪. 文化与时间[M]. 杭州:浙江人民出版社, 1988. [12] 时静. 解析中美跨文化商务交往中的时间观差异与影响[J]. 对外经贸实务, 2014(07): 66 - 69. [13] 王秀琴. 论中美时间观之差异及其成因[J]. 商业时代, 2011(15): 142 - 143. [14] 吴国盛. 现代化之忧思[M]. 北京:生活读书新知三联书店, 1999. [15] 许谦. 跨文化交际中中美时间取向的差异分析[J]. 群文天地, 2012(11): 126 - 128. [16] 曾剑平, 廖晓明. 时间观与民族文化[J]. 南昌:南昌大学学报, 2007(03): 55 - 58. [17] 湛晓白. 时间的社会文化史[M]. 北京:社会科学文献出版社, 2013. [18] 湛晓白. 时间的社会文化史——近代中国时间制度与观念变迁研究[M]. 北京:社会科学文献出版社, 2013.

    相关热词搜索:

    • 范文大全
    • 说说大全
    • 学习资料
    • 语录
    • 生肖
    • 解梦
    • 十二星座

    推荐访问